CreatePredAlphaCost pred_alpha2k alpha11 T0250.t2k.alpha.rdb 2 alpha alpha_prev sum CreatePredAlphaCost pred_alpha04 alpha11 T0250.t04.alpha.rdb 2 alpha alpha_prev sum SetCost wet6.5 3 near_backbone 3 way_back 3 dry5 5 dry6.5 6 dry8 5 dry12 2 \ phobic_fit 2 \ sidechain 6 \ bystroff 5 \ soft_clashes 10 backbone_clashes 2 \ break 20 \ pred_alpha2k 3 \ pred_alpha04 3 \ constraints 10 \ hbond_geom 1 \ hbond_geom_backbone 1 \ hbond_geom_beta 5 \ hbond_geom_beta_pair 10 // Add the following for extra-cellular proteins: # known_ssbond 0.5 # and put ssbond command in constraints file # maybe_ssbond 0.5 // For comparative modeling, increase weight of break and hbond_geom... // put any constraints here, such as helix constraints, strand constraints, // sheet constraints, ssbonds, hbonds, or just arbitrary pairs of atoms. # Conserved H173, H175, and H186 may be part of a metal-binding site. # and should probaby be clustered Constraint H173.NE2 H175.NE2 -10 6 9 1.0 Constraint H173.NE2 H186.NE2 -10 6 9 1.0 Constraint H175.NE2 H186.NE2 -10 6 9 1.0 # The secondary structure patterns seems fairly clear in the t04 predictions: HelixConstraint T10 L18 6.018 HelixConstraint I25 E30 8.218 HelixConstraint Q92 M103 6.218 HelixConstraint T134 R141 6.726 HelixConstraint E162 L163 6.32 HelixConstraint E214 K218 6.588 HelixConstraint Y223 A233 7.254 StrandConstraint L5 Y6 6.084 # s1a StrandConstraint I36 L49 7.0 # s1b ? StrandConstraint E45 L49 7.068 # s2 StrandConstraint K52 A56 6.802 # s3a StrandConstraint F62 L65 6.814 # s3b StrandConstraint Y73 T77 7.021 # s3c # I am assuming that s5 is one rather than two strands StrandConstraint S110 M125 20.0 # s5 was 7.565 # StrandConstraint H120 M125 7.165 StrandConstraint G153 F158 6.785 # s6 StrandConstraint I174 F176 6.246 # s7 # StrandConstraint H186 V192 6.438 # s8a # StrandConstraint V195 Q200 6.065 # s8b StrandConstraint H186 Q200 20.0 StrandConstraint Q206 H208 6.913 # file generated by validate2rr # based on 280 inputs # using the /projects/compbio/experiments/protein-predict/casp6/networks/NN280-240n300.net.28 network # limited to score of .30 or greater. # The score is an approximation of the probability Constraint T38.CB P72.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 3.602 Constraint L11.CB F190.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 O.582 bonus Constraint L11.CB A56.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 0.421 bonus Constraint L5.CB G153.CA -10. 7.0 14.0 0.375 bonus Constraint L65.CB L90.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 0.37 bonus Constraint I155.CB V195.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 0.353 bonus Constraint A56.CB Q92.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 0.345 bonus Constraint V95.CB V192.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 0.326 bonus Constraint L11.CB L163.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 0.323 bonus Constraint M103.CB V192.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 0.321 bonus Constraint V112.CB I174.CB -10. 7.0 14.0 0.3 bonus # from try1-opt2.sheets SheetConstraint A37 G41 F48 G44 hbond G41 5.0 # s1, s2 # SheetConstraint E45 F48 SheetConstraint K52 N57 L65 K60 hbond N57 5.0 # s3a,s3b SheetConstraint E61 K66 N78 Y73 hbond E61 5.0 # s3b,s3c # SheetConstraint E102 S105 D150 K147 hbond L104 5.0 # s? # For try6, doing this next one. ~175 is real buried. SheetConstraint S110 Y115 F172 A177 hbond F176 10.0 # s5a||7 SheetConstraint G153 F158 A177 F172 hbond F158 10.0 # s6^vs7 # for try5 I'm disconnecting this, yet it might be right... # SheetConstraint F202 Q207 K220 T215 hbond F202 5.0 # for try6, we'll rework a sheet based on an rr constraint 38-72 (39-73 SheetConstraint I36 T40 L49 E45 10.0 # hbond? s1^vs2 SheetConstraint G35 L39 Y73 T77 10.0 # hbond? s1||s3c # Now to redirect L108-V123, we changed the constraints above