# command:# Prefix for input files set to /projects/kestrel/users/karplus/burial/undertaker/spots/ # command:# ReadVDW initial.radii # command:Reading spots from dunbrack-925-wet-6.5.spot. Read prototypes from /projects/kestrel/users/karplus/burial/undertaker/spots/../normalize_prototypes/prototypes # command:# reading histogram from smoothed-dunbrack-925-wet-6.5.hist # command:Reading spots from dunbrack-925-dry-12.spot. Read prototypes from /projects/kestrel/users/karplus/burial/undertaker/spots/../normalize_prototypes/prototypes # command:# reading histogram from smoothed-dunbrack-925-dry-12.hist # command:Setting costs from histograms # command:# Prefix for input files set to /projects/kestrel/users/karplus/burial/undertaker/atoms-inputs/ # command:# reading dunbrack-925.atoms.gz # After reading dunbrack-925.atoms.gz have 925 chains in training database # command:# fragment library contains # type length num_fragments num_indexes_used # n-terminus 1 849 20 (100%) # n-terminus 2 842 253 (63.25%) # middle 1 205367 20 (100%) # middle 2 203845 400 (100%) # middle 3 202366 7929 (99.1125%) # middle 4 200913 88584 (55.365%) # c-terminus 1 862 20 (100%) # c-terminus 2 216 148 (37%) # ss-bonds 650 # command:# Reading rotamer library from dunbrack-925.rot # command:# Score parameters set to # sidechain_weight 1 # clash_penalty 4 nats/clash # ss_bond_bonus 50 # known_ss_bond_bonus 1 # chain_break_penalty 5 nats/Angstrom # wet_spot_weight 0.7 # dry_spot_weight 4 # command:# Prefix for input files set to # command:Created new target T0111 from ../T0111.seq # command:# Will now start reporting scores to t111-6.5-12+rot.rdb # command:# naming current conformation t111-rand # command:# created fragments for T0111 from T0111-2oneA-karplus.index # command:# Reading conformation from PDB file try2/t111-2oneA.2.10.pdb # command:# naming current conformation t111-2oneA # command:# ScwrlConform produces command scwrl -i /projects/compbio/tmp/to_scwrl_1509860569.pdb -s /projects/compbio/tmp/to_scwrl_1509860569.seq -o /projects/compbio/tmp/from_scwrl_1509860569.pdb > /projects/compbio/tmp/scwrl.log # conformation set from SCWRL output # command:# naming current conformation t111-2oneA-scwrl # command:# command:# ScoreConform t111-rand 28.7929 bits/residue, 435 clashes t111-2oneA at pool[1] 21.7207 bits/residue, 53 clashes t111-2oneA-scwrl at pool[2] 20.9659 bits/residue, 52 clashes # command:# naming current conformation t111-opt # command:# Will do 10 iterations of optimization # best score in initial pool 20.9664 bits/residue, 52 clashes # optimizing backbone with 50 conformations in pool # doing 10 generations, with 200 new conformations in each generation. # keep at most 20 conformations from old pool # generation 1: best score 20.9664 bits/residue, 52 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 5 ## ReduceClash 6 ## CrossOver 0 ## CrossAndInsert 4 ## TwoFragment 6 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 2 ## InsertAlignment 25 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 2: best score 20.9664 bits/residue, 52 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 12 ## ReduceClash 12 ## CrossOver 0 ## CrossAndInsert 9 ## TwoFragment 7 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 7 ## InsertAlignment 43 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 3: best score 20.9664 bits/residue, 52 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 17 ## ReduceClash 19 ## CrossOver 0 ## CrossAndInsert 13 ## TwoFragment 10 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 14 ## InsertAlignment 47 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 4: best score 20.95 bits/residue, 52 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 25 ## ReduceClash 25 ## CrossOver 2 ## CrossAndInsert 17 ## TwoFragment 13 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 18 ## InsertAlignment 50 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 5: best score 20.95 bits/residue, 52 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 33 ## ReduceClash 31 ## CrossOver 5 ## CrossAndInsert 23 ## TwoFragment 16 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 21 ## InsertAlignment 51 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 6: best score 20.95 bits/residue, 52 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 45 ## ReduceClash 36 ## CrossOver 8 ## CrossAndInsert 30 ## TwoFragment 17 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 21 ## InsertAlignment 53 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 7: best score 20.9276 bits/residue, 52 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 56 ## ReduceClash 40 ## CrossOver 15 ## CrossAndInsert 38 ## TwoFragment 17 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 21 ## InsertAlignment 53 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 8: best score 20.8655 bits/residue, 47 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 67 ## ReduceClash 44 ## CrossOver 25 ## CrossAndInsert 42 ## TwoFragment 18 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 21 ## InsertAlignment 53 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 9: best score 20.8655 bits/residue, 47 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 76 ## ReduceClash 48 ## CrossOver 35 ## CrossAndInsert 47 ## TwoFragment 20 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 21 ## InsertAlignment 53 ## ReduceBreak 0 # generation 10: best score 20.8655 bits/residue, 47 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 83 ## ReduceClash 49 ## CrossOver 50 ## CrossAndInsert 54 ## TwoFragment 20 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 21 ## InsertAlignment 53 ## ReduceBreak 0 # best score in initial pool 20.9664 bits/residue, 52 clashes # optimizing backbone with 50 conformations in pool # doing 10 generations, with 200 new conformations in each generation. # keep at most 20 conformations from old pool # generation 1: best score 20.9664 bits/residue, 52 clashes # Cumulative usage by method: ## InsertFragment 3 ## ReduceClash 7 ## CrossOver 0 ## CrossAndInsert 8 ## TwoFragment 2 ## InsertSSBond 0 ## OneRotamer 0 ## ClashingRotamer 1 ## InsertAlignment 27 ## ReduceBreak 0